From 1d4chan
Revision as of 06:28, 25 March 2017 by 2600:8807:106:3d00:1145:23e0:1230:b590 (talk)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Added a Links section, people often request sites or DA pages of drawfags, this can go here. --Teratogen 21:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Someone better do my request I just added. I need more then five of those. --Anonykota 23:00, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

Newly overhauled, because I'm OCD like that. --Anonymous 7:01, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

And there goes the largest /tg/-related drawfaggotry source link collection. :Awesome: Fatum 01:36, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

Okay, so here's the deal. We can keep the page, but only on the condition that it features no subjective comments whatsoever about the quality of any given drawfag's work or their personality. At most, it may list their usual subject matter and any particularly noteworthy things that they were responsible for illustrating/creating/kicking off - for example, Miko with LCB. Given the nature of this place I don't know if I'm entirely justified banning someone for calling someone else an elitist dick - such opinions are subjective, but we're not exactly trying to maintain a stance of neutrality, here. On the other hand, edit wars are boring and just piss people off, so I'd like to avoid them if at all possible.
NOTE: You ARE allowed to argue with me about this if you think it's a bad way of resolving the problem. I will not ban people for disagreeing with me. I just ask that we can keep such disagreement civil. --Wikifag 10:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
That seems to be a good way to solve the problem. I still think we shouldn't resort to personal attacks in the articles, at least not with a good deal of argumentation behind them. Fatum 21:05, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

"/tg/ has an extremely large population of active drawfags compared to most other 4chan boards." Is this still true? After a trivial amount of digging (because I sure as hell don't trust my own long term memory, if I've even been on /tg/ that long), I have discovered that line was published before the events of Nov. 23, 2009 . A lot has changed since this has written--Emerald Claw (talk) 07:29, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Where's weaver?