Talk:Lawful Stupid

From 1d4chan
Revision as of 19:55, 24 September 2017 by Rene LeMarchand (talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

I don't want to just lose this article's overview of what it is to be Lawful Stupid, but I feel that it is unprofessional and unreasonable to make a judgement on which of the various "stupid" alignments is more or less annoying, funny, stupid, or facepalm-inducing than the others. I think the first couple of sentences can be reasonably kept (in some form, at least), but I would drop the descriptions of the other stupid alignments to a list at the bottom of the page. --Not LongPoster Again 03:20, 7 October 2012 (BST) With the reasoning given, can you call Azurius LS? The approach seems more pragmatic and even counter to traditional lawfulness with having a blanket set of laws that allows for autonomous action.