Talk:Ratfolk
On the topic of Sexy Ratgirls[edit]
So, since I'm the guy going around and adding details about the various ways /tg/ races tend to get viewed through the monstergirls lens (and I have no idea how that happened, but that's another topic), I figured I should add appropriate artwork where feasible. Now, whilst some of the stuff I have is cheesecake art of Ink-Eyes (a canon female Nezumi ninja) and fanon female Skaven, I figure that's alright because, A, the article already mentions they're a beastfolk race, and B, that art shows up on relevant /tg/ threads anyway. Problem is, not all of what I have is SFW.
What I want to define is: when is it appropriate to add less SFW artwork to a page? I know we have the Promotions tag to signal when a page contains NSFW content, or at least imagery, but when is it applicable to use?
And I want to point out that, when I last visited the Skaven page, its gallery featured both a full-frontal of a naked female Grey Seer riding a warpstone dildo and a bunch of male skaven gangraping a female High Elf. Naked/skimpily clad busty ratgirls is pretty tame by comparison.--QuietBrowser (talk) 08:42, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- I'd say mark it appropriately, keep it classy and not too lewd and it should be alright. - Biggus Berrus (talk) 22:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- Alright, gallery is filled; I added the Promotions and Heresy tags, and apart from one extra-mutated Master Moulder, the most "sexual" any of them get is the presence of bare nipples. Remove what's still objectional as need be.--QuietBrowser (talk) 00:42, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
