Talk:Saharduin
this is a joke article, right? Indonesian gentleman 02:17, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
Sort of; more sarcastic really. Saharduin are a real thing, they produced a single mini for them the Rogue Trader days and they get a sly mention in the second edition book Codex Imperialis - AmbullFucker
Wow, I did not know they where such troll bait on /tg/ I must have missed that. AmbullFucker
Oh shit, is THIS where the purple-haired shark girl of /tg/ comes from? I always wondered about that. --NotBrandX 02:22, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Wait, I thought it was Mayhem? She's got long black hair though... Yep, that's Mayhem allright. She's some kind of 'mascot' or 'fursona' for this trance beat musician, also known as Renard. He's got tons of alter egos like Mayhem I guess. Indonesian gentleman 04:51, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Fuck if I know. I just found it during a random thread-flood. -- Jaimas 0:105, 19 November 2011 (EST)
- Wait, this is a thing? That is real? What the actual fuck? Someone else. 01:24, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Sort of. The Saharduin/Piscean warriors are a real thing. Not so convinced about the furfaggotry, because none of those sharks-with-tits are wielding boltguns. They're not 40K or TG, it's just an excuse for an image dump. Not a bad thing, but sharks-with-guns are pretty cool on their own.AmbullFucker 12:22 21st November 2011 (GMT)
Agreed with Ambull, needs moar sharkguns. -- Jaimas
Do we need all the pictures of Lady Sharks? None of them are of Saharduin, but of some furry-thing. Fanpics of Saharduin would be great, but make sure they're actually 40K and not just a fur-thing. AmbullFucker 11:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
- This isn't the Warhammer wiki, this is the /tg/ wiki. Just as every mention of "realistic female strength ranges" turns into a musclegirl thread, nearly any mention of Saharduin will turn into a sharkgirl thread. If they wanted to do research for the next WH40K novel, they'd go somewhere else; if they want to know "why is /tg/ being so fucking retarded" they'll come here. --NotBrandX 16:30, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Page Veiws[edit]
Holy hell, this page just recieved a massive spike in veiws, what happened? Did some idiot link this page on another site? -- Mr. Spooky , 21 November 2011
- It's because of a link complaining about it on /tg/. -- Land Terrestrial, 21/11/11
Oh god, the page is getting... better! Or worse! I can't tell! --FlintTD 05:12, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
It's getting better, but it needs a large dose writefaggotry injected into it if it is to shine. -- Mr. Spooky 9 Febuary 2012 (UTC)
This page has now become lost to Mr Spooky's furfaggotry. It would be nice if you kept the smut to the gallery, but as they aren't actually any 40K Saharduin pics in existence, I feel this will fall on deaf ears. AmbullFucker
You mean these aren't official 40K images? I am shocked, sir, shocked. Tim 17:59, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
AmbullFucker I already responded to you, on this very page, when you got buttmad over this before. And if you looked at the article instead of getting your panties in a self-righteous knot, you'd see that I did post the one-and-only canonical Saharduin picture in existence. [[Image:deal_with_it.png]] --NotBrandX 02:19, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
Sweet-donkey-dicked Emperor, don't get your furry-panties in a twist. I reserve the right to bitch about the lack of shark-girl to gunporn ratio; mostly in the vague hope of getting a drawfag to do something about it, and it is my right as a fa/tg/uy to take the piss from the peanut gallery, that's what it's for. It's not as if I have any power to stop you, nor would I want to if I could. Chill, please. Also, the main image is nicely sinister, well done. [[Image:why_so_serious?.png]]AmbullFucker 16:16, 21 February 2012 (GMT)
- Anything to calm the sea of rage. Although, I did find out what an Ambul was recently...
Wait, why were the lewds removed?[edit]
Seems a bit weird to do, considering that's all anyone stopped by for.
