Talk:Trenchbreaker

Starting work on turning this article from Rawb's attempt at advertising his shitty """wargame"""/setting into an actual 1d4chan article. Anybody from /gdg/ and/or Octo's /tg/ Discord who knows anything about Rawb's stupid ideas and retardation are welcome to edit. --Jondon (talk) 23:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Y'all really need something better to do with your time. It's been months and you're still obsessed with me.

You are our secret shame. You are our sin, our tragedy. How could we forget you? It is too late to right the wrongs made so long ago, so we push on, through the shitposting, like boats against the piss.--Donkey Rocinante (talk) 16:32, 31 December 2016 (UTC)

Not exactly secret if you remind everyone possible of it.

To be fair, the buttmad vandal did a great job of making sure this doesn't stay a secret by having it at the top of the recent changes section all day long with his easily reverted blanking attempts. Tactical Mehren (talk) 02:07, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Took it down because it was more trouble than it was worth and I didn't want to deal with y'all anymore. CardWorkMagician

How to delete pages.

I'm undoing the blank on the main page because that is not how you 'take it down'. The page still exists no matter what you do to it, and the only way you can change this is by putting up a delete tag and getting an admin to remove it. When you put up the delete tag, leave the page as it is. If there's no reason for it to be taken down then it'll be left alone and if it should be gone then it'll be deleted regardless of how much content is on it. Articles with delete tags are reviewed fairly often, so blanking the page gives unnecessary work to whomever is reviewing it and I'd even guess that it's less likely to be deleted because of it. So in summary, put a delete tag on it if you think it should be gone, then don't touch it aside from going to discussion pages to argue your case. -- Triacom (talk) 04:41, 29 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. Anyway, original author here. I want this taken down for a number of reasons. Chiefly, I've been harassed by people from /tg/ on and off for about six months now, and I don't want the reminder available to keep bringing them back. Secondly, I'm no longer working on the game and don't expect it to be published. What little interest /tg/ had in the project has definitely faded since I left, so I don't see any benefit to leaving it up. CardWorkMagician

Question: Since you no longer have any desire to continue being associated with this ruleset nor are you still working on expanding it, is it alright with you if I brought them to others who might still show interest in this game? As far away from /tg/ as possible for your own convenience, but I'm sure others remain elsewhere that would like to see continued development of the base system. Respawn