Talk:Vore

OK. Why is this a thing. On this wiki of all things? - Ben (talk) 10:52, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Maybe scroll to the 'Just...why is this on /tg/?' section? --58.162.223.230 12:08, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

PAINFUL TO READ. - Ben (talk) 14:19, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

This really doesn't need to be here. The connection is flimsy, based on shit fanart and an obscure 40k story. The same argument could be made for a million different things, eg. fart fetish because of Nurgels toxic gases (Don't add that shit to the wiki, I swear to god). The page only exists been added because someone can't keep their dick in their pants. - SabbatMartyr

Agreed. I'm thinking here to actually blank the page or ask the mods to delete it. I'm asking again why is this a thing on this page. It doesn't make sense. - Ben (talk) 22:18, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

I'll speak up in this page's mild defense: Given /tg/'s nature as a *chan board, we need to cover a few of the more common *chan subcultures, because it occasionally comes up in other contexts on /tg/. Similarly subcultures that are hard to defend and get referenced frequently include Furrys, Monstergirls, and My Little Ponys. Just consider it another meme or horrid subculture, and move on. Not defending this iteration of the article, mind, just the need for something like this to exist. Saarlacfunkel (talk) 23:03, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

I reluctantly added this page because vore is a /d/-migrant element that actually does show up on /tg/ pretty frequently (seriously, start a thread about giants, lamias or sphinxes, you WILL get people talking about vore - there was literally a thread on the angel lillend that hit the bump limit like 3-4 times because it was mostly being propped up by vorefags) and it's not exactly a self-explanatory thing. Since 1d4chan exists as a wiki of and about /tg/, I figured some kind of explanation was due. I'll stand by whatever decisions the mods make, but I added it because it seemed reasonable, however gross I find the subject matter.--QuietBrowser (talk) 23:07, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

THEN MAKE A SMALL NOTE ON /d/'s sub-page in the Board-tans page instead of making an article. It should be contained in the image boards instead here making people know more about this shit. - Ben (talk) 23:32, 26 June 2019 (UTC)

If we wanted to stop people running into this sorta thing, we'd have to somehow stop voreposters hijacking threads, and given my experience with fetishes turning brains off? Good fucking luck. I mean we have a Felarya blurb on the Monstergirls page, for fuck's sake.

There's no amount of babyraging that'll change the fact there's little point in hiding the fact it exists on /tg/ - undesirable as it may be it's seemingly the logical conclusion of the board's rep as /d/-lite. --LGX-000 (talk) 03:10, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

I've moved the sheer horror to the bottom and made as much of it collapsible as possible, in hopes of keeping things slightly less nauseating to the unsuspecting. Saarlacfunkel (talk) 01:07, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, I feel like it's a question of how deep we actually go with the subject matter at this point, as opposed to pretending it isn't a thing. --LGX-000 (talk) 03:41, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Voting for both the blanking of this page and removal of any link to it along with removing the subject completely from the wiki's database. - Ben (talk) 10:45, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Cool, you're outvoted. Plus we have a fair amount of shit that'd be considered more objectively gross, so it'd be extra silly to actually go through with that. --2600:1700:19C0:2760:209B:C513:4C6C:40E5 18:16, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

And no, this is not me trying to stack votes or anything, just stating that you're currently the only one who's expressed that, and the way you're going on about it isn't likely to change the minds of people who seem to share a similar disgust for the most part. --2600:1700:19C0:2760:209B:C513:4C6C:40E5 18:18, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Yeah no. Blatant sexual fetishes are a whole different thing. - Ben (talk) 19:26, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

...you really haven't been here long, have you? --LGX-000 (talk) 20:11, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

Can anyone explain why this has its own page and not just a mention on /d/'s page? When the "Why is this here" section is larger than the article, it's not a good article. -- Triacom (talk) 20:52, 27 June 2019 (UTC)

It is about why it is on /tg/ not why it is on this website. --2602:306:B88B:FB60:25C5:BB25:DBDE:195F 21:47, 27 June 2019 (UTC)