Campaign talk:The Ragged Edge of Twilight

From 1d4chan

Wait, this is a recruiting wiki now? Björn_Freigh 06:08, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Keeping track of the game's state at least. Why not? HUGE 06:10, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
I don't see the problem? Keeping logs of different games people play would actually be kinda awesome. --Myomoto 11:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
The 4e game I'm running currently, I type/paste all the IC text into google docs, so the players can hit F5 and know what's going on without having to scroll back through the OOC waffle in the chat screen. Now granted this is 4e so most of the log is 'I use Bladesear(tm) on the goblin!' but for something like Cthulhu the resulting log could be awesome. -Destro
Entirely depends on the game. 72.73.220.147 23:42, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
I'm running a noughts and crosses tournament. Want to hear about it? HUGE 23:51, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Nobody is forced to read any of the content on the wiki, and with proper categorization we'll be able to limit the impact it'll have on casually browsing (IE: It won't get in the way), so I really can't see why people shouldn't do this in the future. --Myomoto 00:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

I agree, this is what /tg/ does: games. But of course I'm biased. HUGE 01:01, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Aye, just wasn't sure if that was the intent. Consensus has spoken though. -Bjorn@Work 72.73.220.147 01:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

I approve of this consensus. However, we should devise a naming convention so that 'Bob's game of Masks of Nyarlathotep' doesn't get confused with 'Masks of Nyarlathotep', the article on the module itself. Any suggestions? Maybe a 'Play:' prefix? -Destro

Yeah, some kind of namespace (or fake namespace). Game: maybe. HUGE 03:43, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
How about simply Campaign: Björn_Freigh 03:50, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Campaign sounds good, with subpages for related bits, I guess. HUGE 03:56, 3 July 2008 (UTC)