Category talk:Approved Media

Shouldnt you add music or something

Web media would be better. Lots of good history resources that can add a lot to historically based roleplaying. --Agiletek (talk) 01:18, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

What to call it, though. "Approved websites" is a little too broad. "Online research resources" sounds wrong as well. Anybody have any ideas? Saarlacfunkel (talk) 02:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Approved WebVideo?

I just want to point to Lindybeige, and say "If you want some history, here's a guy", and Counter Monkey as semi-approved, but I figure there are other history and roleplaying WebVideo/YouTubers worth discussing. I'd include a "No Politics" rule. ("We're not looking for spicy hot takes here, just people whose material is either sufficiently objective, or sufficiently personal, that you could point to it as a source in a debate without apology or disclaimer" maybe?) And maybe a "No reviewers or current events commentary" rule? Either way, would this be a good idea or a terrible one? Saarlacfunkel (talk) 18:42, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Technically Grimdark Creators fills that niche. Not sure if you wanna start pulling things from there into here, but it's not my call to make. 21:48, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

I chose to just move "Grimdark Creators" to a new name (that I don't mind if somebody else nukes, so long as it doesn't go back to "Grimdark Creators", which makes no goddamn sense as a title), and add in a history category. Saarlacfunkel (talk) 11:51, 27 May 2020 (UTC)