Related changes

From 1d4chan

Enter a page name to see changes on pages linked to or from that page. (To see members of a category, enter Category:Name of category). Changes to pages on your Watchlist are in bold.

Recent changes options Show last 50 | 100 | 250 | 500 changes in last 1 | 3 | 7 | 14 | 30 days
Hide registered users | Hide anonymous users | Hide my edits | Show bots | Hide minor edits
Show new changes starting from 16:38, 21 January 2021
Page name:
List of abbreviations:
This edit created a new page (also see list of new pages)
This is a minor edit
This edit was performed by a bot
The page size changed by this number of bytes

18 January 2021

     21:42  Imperial Guard‎‎ 6 changes history +231 [‎; Triacom‎ (5×)]
21:42 (cur | prev) -678 Triacom talk contribs - In the interest of cutting this argument short, I'm cutting down the part on the page to only the most relevant info.
21:17 (cur | prev) +1,010 Triacom talk contribs Undo revision 737683 by (talk) - A) it never said it was invincible, B) we're not talking about Archeotec Tag: Undo
17:36 (cur | prev) -1,010 talk →‎Overview: Thank you for actually agreeing with invincible flak armor being stupid. The next question to answer is exactly how archeotech owned by techno-barbarians allows producing it Imperial-wide
06:44 (cur | prev) +71 Triacom talk contribs - Adding in the alien bit and cleaning that sentence slightly.
06:41 (cur | prev) -77 Triacom talk contribs - Rereading it I do think this paragraph does the job a bit better.
06:40 (cur | prev) +915 Triacom talk contribs - Removing a bizarre quote, and restoring sections of the page.

17 January 2021

15 January 2021

     09:00  Stormraven diffhist +4 talk Spellcheck + linking