Talk:/tg/'s Smut Index

We need some Iron Kingdoms smut. I was thinking Murdoch doing some "special training" with Cylena. - Oboe Concerto, 15:47, 21.08.14

Removed all non-/tg/ smut I found. If they want to write videogame porn, they can take it to /v/

Who made you the sole arbiter of what is and is not /tg/-related? If you want to play the role of the wiki police, try Wikipedia instead. --Newerfag (talk) 01:01, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Last I checked, World of Warcraft was a videogame and Star Wars a series of movies. The threads themselves said that smut should pertain to settings that originated as tabletop games rather than pull from elsewhere.

While I accept the logic behind World of Warcraft if only because of a discussion we had on the flockmod as a result of these edits, I would like to point out that there are multiple Star Wars RPGs, and declaring something "not /tg/-relevant" when you haven't even checked the wiki to be sure you haven't acted too hastily is not very wise of you (not to mention presumptous, since by that definition virtually every piece of smut from a generic fantasy setting should be removed too since it's not specifically from tabletop game settings). --Newerfag (talk) 05:01, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Literally in the currently live thread the decision was made to restrict things to tabletop only setting. Otherwise, there's no reason not to fill this page My Little Pony erotica since it has a TCG and an RPG

And who gave you the authority to decide what a "tabletop only setting" even is? In borderline cases like those, the thread's own consensus decides if a given fic makes the pass, not you. And if you honestly believe using our trolls' arguments as if they were viable proof is going to convince anybody that you are right, you are sadly mistaken. And unlike the pony RPGs, the Star Wars ones have the virtue of being actual RPGs and not homebrews. Oh, and you haven't addressed why you haven't removed all the other generic fantasy smut, since they aren't from tabletop settings either. (Incidentally, the same current live thread you're using as evidence also thinks you're a douche.)--Newerfag (talk) 07:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

No matter what you try to delete faggot, I have backups on backups on backups

Anonymous editor, you already tried to make your point and failed. Removing the content you don't like because you consider it unrelated to /tg/ will not make anybody agree with you, it will only prove that you're an asshole incapable of actually making his points in a reasonable manner. --Newerfag (talk) 23:10, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Ty for organizing things Cooked.

Important announcement

Due to circumstances beyond our control, it appears /wst/ will not be able to continue on /tg/. We're currently discussing what to do from here on the flockmod and the IRC, so go there if you can. --Newerfag (talk) 01:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

https://8chan.co/tg would probably welcome you guys with open arms. there is already a sizable community with acceptance for degeneracy. in addition, the board allows NSFW images--Kapow (talk) 19:55, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

The offer is appreciated, but when I brought the idea up with the other writefags it was soundly rejected. Their community is simply too small and too slow to sustain us, and not enough people on 4chan would be willing to follow. If things go badly on /d/, I would be willing to give it a shot though.--Newerfag (talk) 20:02, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Honestly I think one of the best options for you guys is to wait while this blows over and the troll leaves or finds a different thing to do. Then you guys should be fine back on the boardDragoon508 (talk) 20:31, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

He's been at this for over a year now, and the mods have shown no indication that they'll go back on their current decision to force us off. While I'd love to be back on /tg/, for the time being it's little more than a pipe dream. All I can do now is either hope this exile proves to be a temporary one or try to keep our community alive- I'd have to say that if that died, everything else we've done goes down with it. -Newerfag (talk) 20:44, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

For some reason I am just thinking of a dude like Jack Thompson spending a year trying to break this up now. I have lost my sides from this imageDragoon508 (talk) 22:19, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Jack had a law degree at least. Our troll just has single-mindedness and an unsurpassed level of douchebaggery.--Newerfag (talk) 22:43, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

do we know anything about why this guy is doing this?--Kapow (talk) 22:50, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

No clue. Some of his rants suggest he's trying to "purify" /tg/ by shitposting anything that doesn't meet his criteria of relevance into oblivion, but that might just be an act. I get the feeling we shouldn't stare too deeply into the abyss here, so to speak- if only for sanity's sake.--Newerfag (talk) 23:25, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

Since someone is supposedly trying to get the pastebins deleted, I made a fresh backup of all of them. Comparing it to when I pulled everything a few months ago (to make this), nothing seems to have gone missing. Just FYI. July (talk) 01:01, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks a bunch. It's probably just empty threats, but a little precaution never hurts anybody. --Newerfag (talk) 03:32, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

EFG dead again?

So, did the idiots running the /d/ metathread get efg banned from 4chan? -Notsoanon

Yeah, they're gone from /d/. But I think a wiki was made, and there may be a Discord, but I'm not sure where they are. Anyone from the new efg-hangout want to give us some directions? --Throwawayanon (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

The discord is linked to on the Google doc, the first link on the page. As for where we are now, you can find us on /trash/, in their general writethead. --Newerfag (talk) 19:08, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Why do we keep so many dead links?

This page is packed with content and links that are broken. It just makes it cluttered.Personally I think we should delete dead links rather than just marking them.