Talk:Apocalypse

I know I am being a wide-eyed idealist here, but could /tg/ come up with come kind of homebrew to balance this horrible mess? "I-it's not like I l-like it or anything..." --FlintTD 21:07, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

Unfortunately my talents are limited to bad writefaggotry but I'd also like to see an apocalypse reboot. It would be one hell of an undertaking but if I've learned anything its that /tg/ gets shit done. --Petro 00:49, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

I would do it but I have no time for things of that magnitude. Yet. This is why I ask you guys. --FlintTD 06:55, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

Give me a few weeks to finish this semester, then another few weeks to learn how to play 40k properly, then I'll take a stab at it.130.166.220.254 00:01, 5 May 2012 (BST)

New apocalypse out July 2013. Mainly written by Jervis Johnson and Lord Kellius, so it might not suck and actually be balanced.

Multiplayer turn order

I'll be running an Apocaypse game this week-end and I'm wondering which would be the best option for the turn order.

1- Team A play all their armies and phases than Team B.

or

2- 1 player from Team A play it's army and all it's phases than 1 player from team B play it's army and so on.

It will be a 2000 pts per player with 3-4 player per team game and I wouldn't want to have a player get tabled in first turn.