Talk:Beast: The Primordial

I've heard that the game has been significantly rewritten since this article was made, and so much of it no longer applies. It would be a good idea to rewrite the article in its entirety after the game is officially released. --Newerfag (talk) 04:38, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Or create a new page for the new version and out both in a category about it. Or compress the old info into a small section about the original. Just a suggestion. --Thannak (talk) 06:29, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

The thing is that the new version isn't out yet. Either way, we need to wait for the official release first. When that does happen, your second suggestion sounds better. --Newerfag (talk) 06:37, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Well, it's out now. On the one hand, never noticed the otherkin thing until you guys mentioned it, so I really want to claim an overreaction on /tg/, and the actual final release hasn't actually changed anything anyway. If that's still a problem for us lot, edit away. --Lynkis (talk) 19:13, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

McFarland: The Sickfuckening

I opened up the F&F review for Beast to explore rolling some of its observations into this article, and it turns out that at some point in the last two months Matt McFarland was accused of child molestation and subsequently unpersoned by both RPGnet and Onyx Path. Should we talk about this (whether here or in the White Wolf article) or is it just gratuitous at this point? The F&F reviewer thinks that this provides a frame for the self-indulgent hideousness that is Beast, but in my opinion "the writer was a pedo" isn't a satisfactory explanation of itself. (Incidentally, if there are any EDiots in the audience there's probably enough dirt on this guy to write an article about him now, assuming RPGnet didn't delete fucking everything when they banned him that is.) OriginalPrankster (talk) 00:13, 24 February 2018 (UTC)

That is quite the accusation.--Namefag (talk) 02:32, 24 February 2018 (UTC)