Talk:Dogs

In regards to the deletion

This is a response to whoever put up the deletion template, reason being this page is irrelevant. I think this page is relevant because of the references to D&D, Fantasy and 40K. I do think this page needs more work though. Tyranid Memestealer (talk) 00:45, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

It takes more than that to be relevant. You could also make a page for things like bread or rocks by that logic and have it be totally relevant according to that standard. Just because it appears in fantasy or 40k doesn't mean that it's automatically justified to be on the wiki. Use this standard: if that thing's absence would leave the setting almost unrecognizable, it's relevant. If it doesn't have that effect, it is not. In this case, dogs are hardly crucial to the existence of those settings. --Newerfag (talk) 02:27, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

We also have a page for cats too. By that logic, you should remove that one too.

And now I have. Were I made aware of it sooner, I would have dealt with it at the same time. --Newerfag (talk) 18:27, 11 January 2018 (UTC)