Talk:Fantasy heartbreaker
From 1d4chan
I...really don't think this is a comprehensive enough thing to warrant a page.
- Hence, Skub. Either expand and give examples, or walk away. The Heartbreaker is an ancient TG phenomenon. --Furore23 (talk) 23:32, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- You made the page, that should be your job. If you're too lazy to do that, you shouldn't have made the page in the first place. --Newerfag (talk) 23:33, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- I created it because someone had to. It is no one's 'job' to expand it, it is anybody's opportunity. 1d4chan doesn't need to be a catalogue of every unit and weapon in Warham40k, it should be a repository of TG lore and /tg/ history.
- This just reads like shit you just made up one day, and has nothing to do with either /tg/ lore or /tg/ history. Why not make an article that's actually relevant to /tg/? --Newerfag (talk) 23:54, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- Wrong. It reads like a brief description of a well-known RPG phenomenon. You should try learning something about the site's subject matter before launching your scorched-earth vandalism campaign.
- No such phenomenon has ever been discussed on /tg/, and if it has then it sure as hell wasn't referred to by the name you made up for it. If you don't want your article deleted, improve it. Don't make other people do all of the work you should have done yourself and then get pissy when your shit stub's relevance to the wiki is questioned. Ask yourself: if it was anybody's opportunity, why did nobody even edit it for nearly four years? --Newerfag (talk) 00:10, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- Because they were too lazy? Who knows.
- No such phenomenon has ever been discussed on /tg/, and if it has then it sure as hell wasn't referred to by the name you made up for it. If you don't want your article deleted, improve it. Don't make other people do all of the work you should have done yourself and then get pissy when your shit stub's relevance to the wiki is questioned. Ask yourself: if it was anybody's opportunity, why did nobody even edit it for nearly four years? --Newerfag (talk) 00:10, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- Wrong. It reads like a brief description of a well-known RPG phenomenon. You should try learning something about the site's subject matter before launching your scorched-earth vandalism campaign.
- This just reads like shit you just made up one day, and has nothing to do with either /tg/ lore or /tg/ history. Why not make an article that's actually relevant to /tg/? --Newerfag (talk) 23:54, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
- I created it because someone had to. It is no one's 'job' to expand it, it is anybody's opportunity. 1d4chan doesn't need to be a catalogue of every unit and weapon in Warham40k, it should be a repository of TG lore and /tg/ history.
- You made the page, that should be your job. If you're too lazy to do that, you shouldn't have made the page in the first place. --Newerfag (talk) 23:33, 4 August 2015 (UTC)
Also, you need to stop tiresomely repeating that same debunked "durr you made it up" lie. It's a lie. We've established this. Try and keep up.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=fantasy+heartbreaker
--Furore23 (talk) 00:27, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
- drops mic*
- You didn't establish anything until now. The page was so "brief" it didn't even establish its own subject, let alone that it had been the subject of discussion. Write a page that's more than two sentences long and you might not have to deal with these misunderstandings in the future. --Newerfag (talk) 00:48, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
