Talk:Forge World

From 1d4chan
Jump to: navigation, search

Quick question - Would it be an idea to put the Forge World part about the in-universe Forge Worlds into its own page? I think it deserves to have its own page, what with how important they are to the universe in general, and the company too, in that case. TheWiseDane (talk) 11:27, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

How do you suggest dividing the page? A Forge World and a Forge World (40k/Planet) page, or a Forge World and a Forge World (Company/Games Workshop) article? At a glance there are more articles about the planets than the company. - Biggus Berrus (talk) 14:17, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
I'd take the Forge World (Company) on its own page, since the term Forge World was used for the in-universe setting first, and the company took the name from that. TheWiseDane (talk) 14:37, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Might want to find a different reference on an unbound army of riptides.[edit]

With the riptide wing, you could field an army of riptides and be a bound force. So long as they came in groups between 3 and 9 per group they'd be legit.

Post sources or take off the tin foil[edit]

Enough about this whole "Forge World is showing GW's true colours once again!" You're acting as if they don't have their own degree of autonomy on what they do (while they are not a separate company they have their own choices on what they want to work on/implement) and using really bad justifications for it. Forge World's fucking over Australia? So is the rest of the world, what a shock, stuff's a lot more expensive there than it is anywhere else (hopefully you never look up videogames down there or it'll really set you off). Forge World and GW are run by the same people at the highest levels? Well my city and cities far away from me but still in my country are run by the same guy at the highest level, does that mean it's his fault the roads are terrible? You could really link that to anything else, but the point is you're blaming the main company for stuff they don't really have anything to do with, so unless you've got evidence, you're going to have to admit that GW trying to change their image isn't just a PR image conspiracy that you've concocted. -- Triacom (talk) 10:43, 25 August 2018 (UTC)