Talk:Future Space Hebrews and Christ Spaceships

This abortion isn't a setting, it's a scizophrenic's cry for help. --Newerfag (talk) 06:17, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Bruvas, this is a page created by the gods of Chaos themselves. Think about it: it makes no logical sense what-so-ever, it has war and violence, acceptance of death and ruination, sexual perverseness, and its plot is ever shifting and changing to different directions, not bound to a single, coherent line. Tactical Mehren (talk) 10:08, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

I don't know, the linked thread had some interesting ideas. It would make for a pretty batshit AdEva setting. Thebucketthief (talk) 11:36, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Oh, it's batshit all right, i asmuch as it makes no sense and is a generally incoherent clusterfuck. You do know that settings need to make sense, right?--Newerfag (talk) 14:04, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

I've look at this from all angles and while some tidbits of ideas are interesting, the rest are the equivalent of someone mentally throwing up and cobbling the chunks together to form a story. These/This idea aren't/isn't built for anything at all, much less a campaign setting. All in all, its a mess, /tg/ has since moved on since its creation, drown this in the bathtub. Tactical Mehren (talk) 15:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

We could always put it up as a wall of shame tag or something. that is if it actually was made by a bunch of anons on tgDragoon508 (talk) 19:44, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Nah, it's better for everyone involved to forget it ever existed. This is...well, was beyond any hope of salvaging even for comedic value, and I think I dropped a few IQ points just by reading it. --Newerfag (talk) 20:34, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

Okay, I've undeleted this page, hopefully for the last time. In the latest thread it was brought up there were plenty of anons who supported it and at least one who actually ran a campaign using the setting. Given that this was an original /tg/ creation and is still fondly remembered and referred to by it's users, I say that's more than sufficient reason to leave it up. If you honestly find it that disagreeable, please stick to leaving a disclaimer at the top of the page in future. 1d4chan is an open platform for saving and cataloging things fa/tg/uys come up with, as long as they still believe this is worth remembering I don't see why we should delete their handiwork, no matter how insane it appears. --Cannoneer (talk) 07:36, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

We need standards somewhere, and the last time this was discussed everyone agreed that we were better off without it. If you want to preserve it so badly, you have a perfectly good userpage to do it on.--Newerfag (talk) 18:12, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Leave the page blanked

but not deleted for archival purposes

You have Wayback Machine for that. If you want to keep it, save a copy of it yourself. --Newerfag (talk) 17:04, 6 October 2018 (UTC)