Talk:Legions of Chaos

Perhaps Legions of Chaos needs it's own category, like Undead Legion now has? --Thannak (talk) 05:52, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

I completely agree, though since it has so many units I'm not too sure how it should be managed without becoming a confusing clusterfuck. Maybe a general description of what the unit is good at if it isn't out-shined by something else? With the amount of units between the three there's going to be a lot of units that are going to be outperformed by others, like Grave Guard vs Tomb Guard for example. --Triacom (talk) 9 November 2014

Oh, of course it needs it's own Tactics page. That goes without saying. It'll be long of course, but that's not a problem. It needs to be accurate, and there's a table of contents on pages for a reason. Not like scrolling or using the Find function is hard, although given progress on Undead Legion it'll be very slow for anything other than arguments in a general Tactics section for the army. As someone who plays none of the armies I won't be involved at any rate. I meant a category like "Category:Legions of Chaos" where everything that can be fielded in it is under (like how Khalida and Vlad are Undead Legion and Tomb Kings/Vampire Counts, while Settra and Mannfred are only Tomb Kings/Vampire Counts). --Thannak (talk) 10:36, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Isn't that just what they did on their tactics page? The Undead Legions don't have a standard page, and if you don't want to add anything to those pages tactics wise then there's nothing stopping you from making the page with all of the units names and nothing else. --Triacom (talk) 9 November 2014

Undead Legion --Thannak (talk) 20:51, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

I see, I had searched for that before posting a reply but couldn't find it, thanks for posting it here. -- Triacom (talk) 25 November 2014