Talk:Lofn

From 1d4chan
the small, alien organism beside her pillow let out a relieved ‘unyuu’

snrkfl

Requesting permission...[edit]

Hello Writefaggotry(If you're even reading this)

If this is your story or character "Lofn" I would like your permission to use your character for my fanfiction stories...contact me if you can, thanks!

Oh and 1d4chan if you're reading this...is there any way for me to get in any contact with the authors easier, please I beg of you there stories really makes me feel like I need to type this story or die trying! Okay maybe that was too much but please reply back to me through email. (Oh for some reason my account doesn't read my email so here!) rocketfist14@yahoo.com

Retrieved from "http://1d4chan.org/wiki/Talk:WhipsOil%26Lofn"

after retribution[edit]

Since Ronahn is Taldeer's brother, does that make him Lofn's uncle? maybe he should be added to the writefaggotry.

Fap pics[edit]

Maybe it's just me (or my aversion to loli and shota shit), but it seems kinda sacrilegious to include promotions on this page. It's like having promotions for Noh posted. Obviously, I won't delete the pictures unless by popular consent, but it just seems kinda wrong to me to defile something so innately d'aww. --Kracked Mynd (talk) 05:14, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

It's not just you, I'd completely forgotten about this but I'm right there with you when you say that this seems wrong. -- Triacom (talk) 07:52, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Alright, dope. If there's any kind of consensus I'll remove it. --Kracked Mynd (talk) 20:56, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
I mean, we gotta have some sort of boundaries and loli/shota tends to make a lot of people who are otherwise fine with even the filthiest porn uncomfortable and also can get us into trouble with advertisers who keep this site running. Crazy Cryptek (talk) 22:50, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
I'm also going to go out on a limb and say we probably don't want the types of people that sort of content attracts. -- Triacom (talk) 22:53, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Well you are wrong. All types of people are welcome on 1d4chan. I don't care which groups of people you personally find reprehensible. Your personal morals do not give you the power to make new wiki rules without the consent of the admins--Nubnuber (talk) 22:49, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
I could give the same argument right back at you, why are all types of people welcome? Your personal morals do not give you the power to make new wiki rules without the consent of the admins -- Triacom (talk) 22:53, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
I'm not changing the rules. The current rules as defined by the admins are that lolis are allowed.--Nubnuber (talk) 23:08, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Where's that? Also before you try to lie or strawman me again, nobody has a problem with the loli's, they have a problem with the lewd loli's. -- Triacom (talk) 23:10, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Alrighty, I'll go ahead and delete the pics. I'll also remove any other loli/shota shit I see, minus stuff that makes some semblance of sense, like Franken Fran. --Kracked Mynd (talk) 23:45, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Allow me to offer a compromise. I will put the fap pics in a collapsed section, with a warning, then people who don't want to see it can ignore it.--Nubnuber (talk) 22:46, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
If you want to keep them so badly, why not post them on some other site like Rule34 and put a link to it? -- Triacom (talk) 22:48, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Quoting 2601:602:C900:68F8:F5E2:7E57:F66C:DF06: Rule34's site is vile to try and use by-and-large. Also, I'm not fond of the more lewd images myself, I'm simply trying to help come up with a solution that placates the largest number of people. A collapse section with large warnings should theoretically deter most people who would not like to see the images in question (though one would wonder why someone was looking up "Lolicron" in the first place) while also maintaining bits and pieces of /tg/ history. I mean, if we're going to have a page dedicated to things such as Brundlepenis and such, I think we can all have a little bit of thick skin about loli content so long as it pertains to the pages in question. But I am willing to let Root have the final decision on the matter as they are the admin for the site. --Nubnuber (talk) 00:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Quoting KrackedMynd: "Obviously, I won't delete the pictures unless by popular consent, but it just seems kinda wrong to me to defile something so innately d'aww." Quoting Crazy Cryptek: "I mean, we gotta have some sort of boundaries and loli/shota tends to make a lot of people who are otherwise fine with even the filthiest porn uncomfortable and also can get us into trouble with advertisers who keep this site running." Quoting Anon 73.41.249.220: "I think that he does have a point. This website should have some restrictions on what fetishes are permitted to be shown. I don't think scat porn is allowed on this website even if it is only drawings. And underage is considered too extreme even for a lot of people who like the weirder things like Demon-Man's art." Quoting YOU: "Now that is a sensible argument. Much better than just screaming "PEDO!!!" at everyone who disagrees with you. Alright, you've swayed me." You want to quote more people? I can quote other passages too, some of them your own. -- Triacom (talk) 00:36, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
So you don't have a response to 2601's argument? You didn't respond to him on root's page either--Nubnuber (talk) 00:40, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
I did respond to it, 2601 wrote two comments so I made my responses applicable to both, you can find them at the bottom of the topic you're quoting from. -- Triacom (talk) 00:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

How about this Nubnuber, I'll upload all these pics to Rule34 myself and provide the link on the main page, how's that sound for a compromise? That will get around your complaint that the site isn't friendly to use and that's why you're not doing it. -- Triacom (talk) 19:59, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Why do you care so much that the pics aren't on this site?--Nubnuber (talk) 20:02, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Because I, like the others you saw on this page and Root's page, find the lewd loli images objectionable, and for a time you said that this was enough to convince you. Why do you want the lewd loli images on this site so badly? Also the images are just straight up illegal in many nations and I don't like the idea of people being arrested for looking at the wiki. -- Triacom (talk) 20:04, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Because I am opposed to all forms of censorship as a principle.--Nubnuber (talk) 20:12, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Having standards is not censorship. If somebody posts something entirely unrelated to the wiki, then it isn't censorship if it gets removed, and it's also not censorship if the majority agree it should not be on there. If you're really against censorship, then I fail to see why you wouldn't abide by the deal to host the images on rule34 instead. That way nobody can get arrested for looking at the wiki, and you get to keep your precious images. -- Triacom (talk) 20:16, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Link me to an example of 1 person being arrested for looking at 1d4chan in the 14 some odd years of its existance--Nubnuber (talk) 20:44, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
I can link a bunch who were arrested for looking at fictitious depictions, however as a general principle no news site states the name of the site the offender was arrested for using. If you want to find one you can be sure of however, show your edits to an officer and I'll guarantee we'll have a story to cite. -- Triacom (talk) 21:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
That wouldn't work because I live in the US. The case would be thrown out of court.
We don't want anyone in China to be arrested for looking at 1d4chan, we better remove all the pages about corrupt governments or revolts.
We don't want anyone in the Arab world to be arrested for looking at 1d4chan. We better remove any mention of homosexual relationships.
Start linking, boy.--Nubnuber (talk) 22:01, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
"That wouldn't work because I live in the US. The case would be thrown out of court." You just fucked up, you outright admit you believe you'd be arrested for it. "We don't want anyone in China to be arrested for looking at 1d4chan, we better remove all the pages about corrupt governments or revolts." China already blocks the site, it's pointless to do anything to pander to them. Also unlike lewd loli pics, it's not a perma-ban to post about China on /tg/, the board this wiki is based on. "We don't want anyone in the Arab world to be arrested for looking at 1d4chan. We better remove any mention of homosexual relationships." The wiki doesn't have a section dedicated to that in the first place. "Start linking, boy." Sure thing, in around 12 hours or less the pics will be replaced with links to some site like Rule34 or some other place in a "See Also" section on the page. This way they're not on the wiki, and you get to keep your precious images. By the way, it's not a good look to refer to other people as kids while you're literally uploading pictures of kids being fucked, and have stated that kids are a fetish. -- Triacom (talk) 07:43, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
"You just fucked up, you outright admit you believe you'd be arrested for it." No, we've been through this before. I would not be arrested for cartoons in the US. But hypothetically, Triacom, if you were a cop, and you arrested me unconstitutionally for possession of cartoons, the case would be thrown out of court. "Sure thing, in around 12 hours or less the pics will be replaced." No retard, I meant start linking examples of people being arrested for cartoons in Europe.--Nubnuber (talk) 13:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
You just said it would be thrown out of court, that can only happen if there was an arrest first, ergo you believe you will be arrested. Furthermore I can find cases in the US where people were arrested for these sorts of images as well. Hell, there's even a case in the US where a man was convicted for it. "No retard, I meant start linking examples of people being arrested for cartoons in Europe." You didn't specify that, but since you asked so poorly here you go. I'm not sure why you limited it to just Europe, there's so many places with cases in places like Canada, Australia and New Zealand. -- Triacom (talk) 15:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Alright, let me make this clear. DEAR TRIACOM, I, NUNBUBER, DO NOT BELIEVE THAT I WILL BE ARRESTED FOR CARTOON NSFW LOLI. If I post a picture of me and the local sheriff holding up a loli doujin while smiling and giving thumbs up, will you stop with this, "But it is illegal, because I said so" line of argument? In the first link you posted, the article literally mentions that the law is unconstitutional.--Nubnuber (talk) 22:05, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
"I, NUNBUBER, DO NOT BELIEVE THAT I WILL BE ARRESTED FOR CARTOON NSFW LOLI." Then walk into a police station and start showing some around. "will you stop with this, "But it is illegal, because I said so" line of argument?" Do you think those six cases I just posted, including one in the US (which resulted in a conviction) are made up? "In the first link you posted, the article literally mentions that the law is unconstitutional." Yest it still landed a conviction, and I've got news for you, people outside the US use 1d4chan. -- Triacom (talk) 22:09, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
All of the cases you linked were based on downloading images on their computer, not for visiting sites that had loli images.--Nubnuber (talk) 22:33, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Then look up Pete Townshend, it's absolutely possible to be arrested for looking at a site containing "child sexual acts" (which is Britain's term for fictional CP). -- Triacom (talk) 22:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
That was real-life CP, not cartoon CP. To date, you have not been able to show me a single case of someone being arrested for visiting a site that hosts cartoon loli images on 3 of its countless pages.--Nubnuber (talk) 22:40, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
And you know it was real how? No news site ever states which sites the offenders used for obvious reasons, however I have proven that it is illegal in many countries to visit sites containing them, because possession is only one of the crimes people get charged with. I can also cite the wikipedia section that shows it's illegal in most first world countries, with the only two exceptions being the US and Japan, and even in the US it's illegal if extra conditions are met. -- Triacom (talk) 22:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
"The wiki doesn't have a section dedicated to that". I guarantee you there are at least a dozen primarch writefag stories on here with homoerotic themes. Half of all Critical Role characters are either bisexual or lesbians constantly hitting on each other. Car Lesbians. Literally any erotic rpg, including FATAL, that has mechanics for gay sex. "it's not a perma-ban on /tg/". /tg/ is a blue board. ANY NSFW images are a bannable offense--Nubnuber (talk) 14:23, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Homoerotic themes are not the same as having a section dedicated to homosexual depictions. "/tg/ is a blue board. ANY NSFW images are a bannable offense" And since this is a /tg/ archive, why would we not follow their example? -- Triacom (talk) 15:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Then go through the pages in Category:NSFW and remove every single nsfw picture on the wiki. If things not allowed on /tg/ are not allowed on 1d4chan--Nubnuber (talk) 21:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
If that's what it takes I will gladly do that. -- Triacom (talk) 21:56, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Kinda defeats the purpose, a good archive keeps trace of everything that happened; good, bad and ugly. Only keeping the good and throwing the rest out is not very objective.
You can record something happening without keeping pictures, wikipedia does not need to host CP to talk about it either. -- Triacom (talk) 16:59, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

You dont have a majority. Neither of us do. The majority of users don't care and thus haven't weighed in.--Nubnuber (talk) 22:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

I have Kracked Mynd, Crazy Cryptek, myself, anon starting with IP 58, anon with variable IP who started with 2601, and Konrad. You have... Agiletek and an anon with a variable IP, that's 6v3, you're in the minority. -- Triacom (talk) 22:46, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
I support moving the images to probably /tg/booru and just linking them. Off site but still accessible to the degenerates who want them. --Konrad13 (talk) 11:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Account creation is gone on /tg/booru, so only people who already have an account can upload there.--Nubnuber (talk) 13:47, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Lofn story confusion[edit]

"It was something she always said to keep their hopes up and she took one last look at the ghostly image of her lover before falling asleep. Though she was asleep, the apparition did not disappear. The scarred man got up and leaned over his lover and longingly stroked her lips and brushed his own with those same fingers. He then kissed his daughter’s forehead exactly where her mother did and slowly got out of bed and stood. He took a few minutes to watch over the two as they slept and finally let out a sad smile. “Goodbye… I love you both.”

LIIVI slowly vanished, the wisp of his smile being the last to finally smoke away inside the room’s breezeless air. He would be waiting for them."

What's going on here? Is he dead and watching over them? Why is he dead? --Kvist (talk)

God fucking damnit, no sad shit in the LCB fandom! There's literally hundreds of thousands of grimdark fiction opportunities in the 40k universe, why this one too?

It's a vision, I thought that part was kind of obvious. If he was dead then there could be no way "He would be waiting for them." Since they'd never be able to meet in death. -- Triacom (talk) 06:34, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
That's assuming the anonymous author didn't write his own version of an afterlife and followed canon. Otherwise, how is he still there after she falls asleep? And where would he be waiting for them? The ghost that watches over his family seems to be the trope that the author is going for. Does anyone know who the author is? This story triggers me. --Kvist (talk)
"How is he still there-" Because it's a vision. If the author made up their own version of afterlife in 40k then they need to say it or we have to act as if that's not the case. "Where would he be waiting for them?" Take your pick, there's a million fucking locations. -- Triacom (talk) 04:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
But it's clear Taldeer is asleep, yet the supposed vision is moving about and communicating. How about this: I'll pay a finder's fee to whoever can track down the author and pay for the author's time to discuss this. The story has been an obsession of mine for far too long. --Kvist (ta1lk)
It's moving about and communicating because it's a vision. I don't see which part of this you're not getting. -- Triacom (talk) 06:31, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Okay, but a vision of what?? Is she somehow seeing him in truly in captivity, waiting for his rescue? Or is it a figment of her imagination, and in all actuality he's dead and gone and she pretends he will be rescued or wait for them in the afterlife? And the fact that he's moving while she sleeps is huge - she would need to be conscious to contrive a vision, yes? Or did she slip into a dream and the story just assumed we would understand that transition? --Kvist (talk)
It's a vision of him, what it represents isn't spelled out so it's up to you, however once again I'll state that if he was dead it would be impossible for him to wait for them, because it would be impossible for them to meet in death purely because of what happens to the Eldar when they die. "she would need to be conscious to contrive a vision-" You're getting this from where? Frankly it doesn't matter if she's asleep or not, because somebody you're having a vision of moving around your environment isn't a big deal in the slightest. I'm still not seeing where you're getting tripped up with the vision, seeing as how this isn't an especially uncommon occurrence with Psykers, and considering how Taldeer's a Farseer, it's not likely to be the first time she's come across this type of vision. -- Triacom (talk) 08:01, 22 March 2019 (UTC)