Talk:Richard Garfield

if this just goes to an image of the unglued card for RG, which is already on the Magic: The Gathering article, why even have this article? --Anonykota 06:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. Is´nt there anything vaguely intresting/informative/lulzy about the man?

Well, gee, I dunno, maybe the fact that he designed MtG and RoboRally? It's just a question when someone will get off his ass and write something. I thing Richard is definitely one of the people that deserve their own page. Or at least make it a redirect to MtG and have a paragraph for him there.--Teataine 12:52, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Why bother? Just mentioning him on each page should be enough. It already says on the MtG article that he designed MtG. Put something similiar into the RoboRally article and this one is pointless.--Anonykota 20:26, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

Redundent. Blank eeeeet! BladePHF 21:57, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Look, I think you guys may be going a bit overboard on the deleting things. Sure, the page is kind of pointless, but then again, so is this entire damn wiki, in the grand scheme of things. If someone looks at it and is briefly entertained then it has served its purpose. The subject is related to /tg/ in some manner and the page is doing no harm by its existence, so just leave it or write a more informational page if it bothers you so much. --Carcer 01:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

DRAMA. Srsly, there is no point to the page. It was merely a full page dedicated to an image already in the Magic: The Gathering article. Stop whining, this page was pointless to begin with.--Anonykota 02:48, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Rewrite it or stop your whining. Fatum 12:16, 3 September 2008 (UTC)