Talk:Sentinel

Are you sure you're even flaming the right person Commissar?

I didn't even touch the GDI Juggernaut reference on this page bro. I just noted that it seemed to be a bit of a stretch since the Juggernaut is a giant superheavy walker that fits an actual factual battleship turret (those things weigh hundreds of tons and sling around shells the size of small cars) while the Sentinel is a tiny light walker meant for reconnaisance and fast attack; like a light tank. Plus the skinny design is more reminiscent of the AT-ST and RT from Star wars than the big bulky Juggernaut. However I didn't delete it. I mean even if you are flaming me I don't particularly care what we note that the Sentinel is visually referencing as long as the AT-ST/RT that the Sentinel is pretty obviously referencing gets a shout out. I personally don't see the connection, since the closest comparisons out of GDI's arsenal would be the Pitbull or Wolverine or the Humvee if you're an oldfag who wants to stick to C&C 1 references; but I'm not in a big hurry to delete it. On that note, are there any actual indirect fire artillery walkers in the entirety of 40k? To my knowledge every indirect fire weapon in 40k is mounted a field artillery piece, a tracked vehicle, or a hovercraft. There might be some indirect fire infantry mortar or some wheeled vehicle I'm forgetting but I can't for the life of me recall any walkers or monstrous creatures with barrage weapons besides I believe the reaver titan's apocalyptic barrage missiles and the Transcendant C'tan's anti-matter meteor, the closest would be Biovores but they're simply very bulky infantry. Crazy Cryptek (talk) 19:23, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

• Indeed. And I can say for a fact that he's not flaming the right person, because the person who continuously undid his obsession with attaching a completely irrelevant vehicle to the article, is me. My guess is he lashed out at you because you had an account he could identify and target, and I do not.

>we are editors >on the internet >on an Laotian Chess Wikipedia website >we do it for free >we takes our "job" very seriously >we does it because it is the only amount of power and control he wilI ever have in his pathetic life >we deletes threads he doesn't like because whenever he gets upset he has an asthma attack >we deletes threads he doesn't like because they interfere with the large backlog of little girl chinese cartoons he still has to watch >we will never have a real job >we will never move out of his parent's house >we will never be at a healthy weight >we will never know how to cook anything besides a hot pocket >we will never have a girlfriend >we will never have any friends

Not with that attitude, anyway

"We deletes threads he doesn't like" if you're going to try flaming with that damp match of yours you might as well try to use proper grammar loser. And lol, you can't even get the wiki formatting right. Amazing. Crazy Cryptek (talk) 22:08, 21 April 2017 (UTC)