Talk:Shota Gnomes
From 1d4chan
MY EYES Fatum 02:55, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
OH GOD MY SAN POINTS! --ManWithNoName 02:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
What the hell is this anyway? --Myomoto 15:56, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
No mention of the artist returning to /tg/ and having a shitfit? --teratogen
Deletion Nomination[edit]
- Weak Keep: The topic is legitimate, it's an incident that happened on /tg/. The question is more whether we need the pictures uploaded as well, given that they're horrible and poorly drawn. --Destro
- Meh, keep the pictures. There are things far worse than this.
- That doesn't mean we should give a shit about them. If we aren't making pages for tripfags, we don't need an article for this heap of shit. --m/ShI 20:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
- Almost sounds like you want an article for tripfags. But I agree- the Shota Gnomes article really has no purpose for existing. It was one forgettable dump of perfectly horrid porn. It doesn't get mentioned in /tg/ at all nowadays, and to be quite frank that is some UGLY art. Do you want an article on naked RMD pictures to accompany this on the basis that it was notable (And horrible) once? BloodyWanker 21:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- No, I'd really prefer not to have an article about tripfags. I was just using that as an example of something we've already specifically said we won't do. Also YAY FOR WIKIFAG. THANK GOD. --m/ShI 17:38, 11 July 2008 (UTC)
- Almost sounds like you want an article for tripfags. But I agree- the Shota Gnomes article really has no purpose for existing. It was one forgettable dump of perfectly horrid porn. It doesn't get mentioned in /tg/ at all nowadays, and to be quite frank that is some UGLY art. Do you want an article on naked RMD pictures to accompany this on the basis that it was notable (And horrible) once? BloodyWanker 21:26, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
- That doesn't mean we should give a shit about them. If we aren't making pages for tripfags, we don't need an article for this heap of shit. --m/ShI 20:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
