From 1d4chan

Even though the article's subject is the source of the icon image for Template:Editwar, what's been going on with the main page has *not* been an edit war, since people are adding to the mess instead of deleting content or replacing content. How ironic. --NotBrandX 19:57, 23 February 2010 (UTC)QUIET SKUB SYMPATHIZERS

I just love this page so much. --FlintTD 11:54, 26 September 2011 (PDT)

Same dude The kreigerstine (talk) 02:06, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

How can this page be bad and awesome at the same time? --Guest, 7:35, 11 November 2001

I cannot help but feel you have not fully understood the article. Nevertheless, those templates are clearly in the wrong order. -- 21:56, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Why would you even give this an article, skub is utter shit!

On a related note, what side are you guys on for the Skub debate? Personally, I'm anti-Skub... --Riptidemtmte 17:21, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Skub is awesome and badass!-- 22:39, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

had to revert the page because some anti-skub jackass went and deleted the majority of the page. it's fixed back to the hilarious mess it used to be. --RecordkeeperInferno 11:16, 6 June 2017

Does this recent change not ruin the joke? Sicarius (talk) 01:19, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

What the heck is skub? SpiderDruid7 (talk) 20:17, 24 January 2019 (PT)

Fuck Skub!

Fuck you! Skub! --Kracked Mynd (talk) 07:46, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

the edit war seems to have calmed down some The kreigerstine (talk) 04:20, 6 August 2020 (UTC)