Talk:The Book of Weeaboo Fightan Magic

From 1d4chan

This is good as a gag article but shouldn't we have a real page fore the book of nine swords?

Just add relevancy to this article. A new heading, detailing what's in the book. There's no reason the article can't be both. Björn_Freigh 19:55, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
I suppose the article to be informative enough right now. We don't need a retelling of the book's contents, just a quick overview and an explanation how the book is referenced on /tg/, I think. Fatum 20:14, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
What I don't get is the reference to Monte Cook. He had nothing to do with the book and in fact was long gone from WotC at the time it came out. ****

Nobody will probably ever read this, but in a post-4e world it is very fun to read through this book again and see how it was pretty much a prototype of the 4e system. They even kept some of the maneuver names and used them as powers. I personally really like 4e, but regardless of your stance on that edition it's at least interesting to see where it came from.