Talk:The not New Phyrexia Praetors

Is this article really needed? - Biggus Berrus (talk) 13:07, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Probably not, but the 40k to non 40k ratio of pages is way off and I am pretty sure there are plenty of other pages (40k or other wise) I would not consider "really needed". It's not like pages are a limited resource and it is related to mtg and by extension /tg/. It's mainly here to point out that the New Phyrexian Praetors aren't the only creatures with the "Praetor" creature type in mtg (at least oracle text wise, which is all that matters in terms of gameplay). It also serves to highlight the similarities and differences between them and the 5 main leaders (at least ostensible in the case of the Vicious Swarm) of New Phyrexia. So while I don't consider it "really needed", it does have a purpose related to /tg/. And that is more than some other pages (e.g. EA) can rightfully claim--Emerald Claw (talk) 20:33, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

The whole page ratio thing is a non-argument, and if you think that other pages are not needed please raise the argument in their respective talk pages. This article mentions two Praetors but not who they are or their importance in their respective blocks' storylines (not). Perhaps it can be merged with the main Praetor article, but as is it's rather meager. - Biggus Berrus (talk) 21:10, 3 December 2014 (UTC)