Talk:Warhammer 40,000/7th Edition Tactics/Necrons

How about cleaning up this mess? The crissed out words is a fun part of 1d4 chan but frankly all the leftovers from the 5E book has made this place a mess.

oh and also add links to the models in the unit analysis section. for example "necron warrior" would lead to http://1d4chan.org/wiki/Necron_Warrior just like the named characters lead to their pages

• Purged the strikethroughs from the article unconditionally. Let me know if anything reads strange after the edits. Wogbork Madblasta (talk) 01:55, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

• • Also added links to models that have pages made already. Wogbork Madblasta (talk) 02:13, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

Maynarkh Flayed Ones

Could you please state where it says you should use the profile and weapons in the codex rather than in the supplement? This would work the same for Scarabs I assume? Angry Pirate (talk) 20:53, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Rods of the Covenant

• Base text: "Some weapons can be used in different ways, representing different power settings or types of ammo. Some weapons can be used in combat as well as shooting. Where this is the case, there will be a separate line in the weapon’s profile for each, and you can choose which to use each turn."

Important bit: "you can choose which to use each turn"

There is nothing that prevents you from choosing both. It does not say "you can choose one to use each turn. Meaning you can choose to use both. Angry Pirate (talk) 11:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Mindshackle Scarabs

What's this about it being FAQ'd? Doesn't seem to exist anywhere else and certainly not on GW / Black Library website. Has he author got confused between the old 6E dex > 7E FAQ, instead of the new 7E dex (which presently AFAIK doesn't have an FAQ?) Ffyllotepk (talk) 16:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Whoops, posted the wrong FAQ by mistake. -- Triacom (talk) 19:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

That's an old faq and isn't relevant. That faq us dated May 14. The new codex came out in April 15. The link to that faq belongs in previous codex tactics for early 7th, not this codex. Sorry. No one will accept that as current rules for use with current rulebook and current codex.Ffyllotepk (talk) 19:03, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, you posted that right after I realized my mistake. -- Triacom (talk) 19:05, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

no worries buddy. On the basis the article makes a claim I don't think can be supported can we remove references to it having been FAQd and explain what it does again? Ffyllotepk (talk) 19:11, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

I've already changed it back, and if you can see a mention on there now that they're good in any way please point it out because I cannot. -- Triacom (talk) 19:45, 31 January 2016 (UTC)