Talk:X-Wing/Tactics/Rebel Alliance
From 1d4chan
Subpage it[edit]
Since this is a faction for multiple separate games, the tactics ought to be moved to sub pages so all three can be included. Same deal with the other Star Wars factions. --Agiletek (talk) 05:34, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
- I disagree, kinda. See my thoughts on this is unlike 40k, where we have a 'lore' page for the faction and that links off to the tactical articles, when it comes to star wars. . . well wookieepedia exists. Honestly I think the text between the top quote and first ship should be deleated because A: we don't need the lore wookieepedia does it better and B: so it mirrors other 1d4 chan tactical articles. The orc tactic page for example has only 12 words before the entries. Heck this page should be called 'X-Wing/Tactics/Rebel Alliance. only reason it's just called "Rebel Alliance" is, frankly I was in a hurry to split the page X Wing page since I didn't want somebody to come in the middle of the edit and wonder "WTF is going on where the page go?" so I just turned the faction names into empty page links. Likely? In hindsight no, but meh what's done is done. To get at the root of your comment, I think if any subpageing is to be done it should subpage off the general X wing tactical page I likely do it later in the evening my self actually. So watch this space(?).
- OH ya this is me. Really thought I had a log in already just too lazy to log in, guess not. OH well.
- There's also dedicated 40k wikis, as well as wiki for various D&D settings we cover. We cover the lore for a reason. --Agiletek (talk) 04:21, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Not a project I'm interested in so if somebody else wants to make those generla lore pages for star wars that's up to them, I'm just a newly minted X-wing nerd trying to polish the pages up to match 1d4chan's excellent 40k tactical guides in terms of appearances, so if you do sub page this fine by me.
- I disagree, kinda. See my thoughts on this is unlike 40k, where we have a 'lore' page for the faction and that links off to the tactical articles, when it comes to star wars. . . well wookieepedia exists. Honestly I think the text between the top quote and first ship should be deleated because A: we don't need the lore wookieepedia does it better and B: so it mirrors other 1d4 chan tactical articles. The orc tactic page for example has only 12 words before the entries. Heck this page should be called 'X-Wing/Tactics/Rebel Alliance. only reason it's just called "Rebel Alliance" is, frankly I was in a hurry to split the page X Wing page since I didn't want somebody to come in the middle of the edit and wonder "WTF is going on where the page go?" so I just turned the faction names into empty page links. Likely? In hindsight no, but meh what's done is done. To get at the root of your comment, I think if any subpageing is to be done it should subpage off the general X wing tactical page I likely do it later in the evening my self actually. So watch this space(?).
