User talk:2605:E200:D111:1:225:90FF:FE24:3F9E
This section was simply a poorly written mess, and it really served no purpose, and it's simply easier to nuke it than to try to fix it. It's riddled with subjective opinions, references events that appear not to have actually happened. And frankly it doesn't fall into the purview of a /tg/ wiki
I can see the reason for an /m/ essentials for clearly defining /m/ and it's possible relationship with /tg/, but why does there need to be section that's basically the writer ranting about shows he doesn't like? If it's shows that /m/ doesn't like how do you make that determination given the volatile, and constant changing nature of /m/ discussions. Shows are constantly called both the best show ever, or the worst show ever. The section ripped on shows that are frequently discussed favorably on /m/, and left out shows that often trashed on /m/. How would you characterize shows like Gundam Zeta which is declared to the be worst gundam show on /m/, multiple times a day, while also praised as the best show just as frequently?
Might be better to avoid the whole mess, and stick with something substantial.
This is the discussion page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet, or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.
