User talk:Flufflion
Contents
RE: Our recent debates[edit]
I know you're angry with GW over their favoritism, but so is virtually everyone else here (even the Imperium players). Preaching to the choir is a waste of time, so maybe it would be better to expand on the xenos articles we have now instead? The Tyranid units still need pages for several of their units done, so how about we bury the hatchet and focus on adding to the wiki instead of continuing to argue like we have so far. It's better than simply talking at each other, because neither of us is going to budge on this issue and it'll just keep spilling into other articles if we keep it up. --Newerfag (talk) 05:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Re: re: Our recent debates[edit]
If bears worth mentioning that out of the wreckage of clusterfuckery that comes out of the bitchfights of various editors, a gem of comedic explanation can be made that explains the different opinions represented. Instead of simply clicking the 'undo' button to make it go away, incorporating things into the article can be far more constructive. If the debate is big enough, which this is in fact, then a whole new article on it should be made with the bulk of the discussions being transcribed to that new page with a minor summary remaining on it's parent page along with a link. Also, games other than Warhammer 40k are far more in need of help. Warhammer Fantasy, the Dungeons and Dragons settings, and so forth. --Thannak (talk) 06:00, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
- True, but I think we could go without making another skubtastic page that exists solely as a place for people to bicker and argue. It would be better to focus on improving what we have now and let the issue drop entirely.--Newerfag (talk) 06:08, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Re: Recent Debates (Burying the Hatchet)[edit]
Thank you for explaining. It was not my intention to debate or complain, I just wanted to get information from other people in the Warhammer fanbase and enlighten those who may not know (You make good points, though I disagree with your assessment that everybody on 1d4chan knows about the full history of GW favouring the Imperium and [most, but not all, of the time] screwing the rest of the fanbase over). But since I didn't mean to start a debate, so long story short I am sorry about this misunderstanding between us. To be honest, it's my understanding that the discussion page was a place to express opinions and views as well, not just discuss facts and figures.
- I understand. Its just that things were getting a little bit too heated and I wanted to keep things from boiling over. I've been told I can be excessively opinionated and didn't want our bickering to spill any further. Thanks for understanding.--Newerfag (talk) 13:20, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Improval and Information[edit]
When you said "improve what we have now?" What did you mean by that in particular? Do you mean adding character pages and discussing lore? You sound like someone who's very knowledgable about the fanbase, the game and the setting.
