User talk:Nubnuber

From 1d4chan

Moralfag Triggered by Cartoons[edit]

If you want to defend why you're adding underage porn to the wiki, you should head over to Root's talk page, that's where everyone's discussing it. -- Triacom (talk) 21:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Cartoon loli is not considered Child Porn under the laws of the united states. You're acting like a petulant child right now.--Nubnuber (talk) 21:15, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

That's not justification for adding it, go to Root's talk page if you want to defend it. -- Triacom (talk) 21:19, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Yes it is. NSFW images are allowed on the wiki. Loli is just another fetish.--Nubnuber (talk) 21:47, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Children are not a fetish. -- Triacom (talk) 21:49, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
That is objectively wrong because pedos exist.--Nubnuber (talk) 21:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
Plenty of mental illnesses exist, and why should we be trying to attract pedo's? -- Triacom (talk) 21:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Your Behavior[edit]

Listen boy, I don't give a rat's butt what you think or the mental gymnastics you try to pull, you are full of crap and a borderline(if not outright) troll who has been told by a veteran editor to let go of this. Your behavior is inappropriate and shows a complete lack of the understanding of the English language. If you have any interest editing on this wiki you will deal with it. People clearly are tired of you and want you to knock it off, and seeing as you have no argument countering what people are saying, I suggest you shut your mouth and find another page to edit. I'm tired of having to check on your escapades every time I log on and see you are acting like a retard. --Lord Of The Lemmings (talk) 03:51, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

"veteran editor". Seniority doesn't mean shit when he's vandalizing pages. "You have no argument countering what people are saying". You clearly have not read the talk pages.--Nubnuber (talk) 02:31, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Removing dead image links is not vandalism, Root even says adding them is not helpful, so can you agree to stop doing it? -- Triacom (talk) 02:34, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Removing the image links when they were still alive was vandalism.--Nubnuber (talk) 02:36, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Not when it was agreed by a majority. You also aren't answering the question, will you stop adding the links please? -- Triacom (talk) 02:41, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
We've already discussed why that isn't a majority. The majority of editors did not weigh in at all. There were like 5 people in that talk page. There are hundreds of editors.--Nubnuber (talk) 02:44, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
The majority of people who voted Nubnuber. Now, can you at least say you won't add the image links back in? -- Triacom (talk) 02:48, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
That's not an argument. If five guys on a random talk page agree to put scat porn on every tactics page and nobody notices it, they don't get to then call the people undoing their vandalism vandals themselves.--Nubnuber (talk) 02:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Anybody who disagrees is free to speak up, and your example has nothing to do with the page in question. The issue was also dealing with what people were comfortable with, and as I've pointed out before, even pages that talk about this do not need to host it. Wikipedia for example does not need to host CP to have a page on it. Also, can you agree to not add the links anymore? -- Triacom (talk) 02:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Those images were originally posted in /tg/ threads. They were of /tg/ characters. They are therefore /tg/ relevant. That is why they were on the page. I am speaking up.--Nubnuber (talk) 03:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
First, source? Secondly, that was already against /tg/'s rules. Thirdly, can you agree not to keep posting the links? I'm asking because I don't like waiting to see if you will or won't, so just say you won't and we can be done with it. -- Triacom (talk) 03:10, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
"Your example has nothing to do with the page". How is that not a perfect analogy for what you did?--Nubnuber (talk) 15:46, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Don't start this again.--2600:1010:B129:743C:5490:3698:9396:6673 16:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
I concur with the anon. Knock it off and find something else to do besides upload Child Porn. Go see one of the tactics pages and see how you can help, or contribute on the Star Wars the Clone Wars/Rebels/Resistance pages. But do something besides waste our time. --Lord Of The Lemmings (talk) 18:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
Because the tactics pages have nothing to do with scat, now getting back on topic, since you cannot commit to what you promised, I'll assume you still plan to put those links on the pages sometime in the future. -- Triacom (talk) 18:49, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
I'm going to have to agree with this guy Nubnuber. While I agree with some of the points you have made, you are not handling this very maturely and you need to stop editwarring with the other editors.--2600:1010:B12D:659D:B1BC:EBDE:CA09:3169 04:16, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
@Lord Of The Lemmings: chill out, dude --Root (talk) 18:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Yes sir.--Lord Of The Lemmings (talk) 18:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

@Nubnuber: please stop embedding/linking files that don't exist anymore, it is not helpful behaviour --Root (talk) 18:33, 2 October 2020 (UTC)