- It was a Hussarzwei edit I was undoing. ZeonPonyWolf (talk) 17:43, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
Minorities in the Imperium of Man
Noticed you tried restoring this. That page was blanked for a reason, as detailed on the talk page, rev logs, Root's talkpage, and the like. So, y'know, maybe trying to reinstate shitty, thoroughly bait-filled pages that're only still around because Root can't be arsed to delete them isn't such a good idea? --Ow, My Sanity. (talk) 14:13, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- What's wrong with a page that trolls /pol/acks? -- ZeonPonyWolf (talk) 10:08, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Did you even read the associated pages? We do not need pages aimed purely at provoking people (no matter their views) into edit-warring (and that's without them being able to claim 'Well, you trolled us first, so NYEH!' as an excuse) and that particular page was agreed upon by everyone excepting you to be shitty, arguably racist, and ultimately nothing but one long page of bait for tumblrtards and /pol/iticians alike - none of which is desirable for this wiki. And your reasoning for restoring this amounts to... well, 'lolololol, trolling /pol/acks is good, amirite?'.
- You're straying dangerously close to HussarZwei's attitude on this, ZPW, and I dearly hope you understand why that's a bad thing. --Ow, My Sanity. (talk) 11:25, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
While there may be nothing wrong with trolling /pol/acks, what you are doing is not trolling. You're just typing rabid trollbait and/or agendaposting, often at the expense of the very points that you are trying to make. One example wuld be the page of /pol/ itself, where you replaced a clever satire of /pol/tards with redundant listing of something that had already been mentionned. Don't interfere with User:Saarlacfunkel unless you're willing to put the effort and the research.